Five Million Voices

Should overseas telecommunications providers serving New Zealand consumers be explicitly brought under New Zealand's telecommunications regulation, levies, and interception-capability obligations, backed by a new licence-revocation enforcement mechanism?

This Government omnibus bill amends the Telecommunications Act 2001, the Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Act 2013 (TICSA), and the Radiocommunications Act 1989. Its general policy statement says the single broad policy is to ensure overseas telecommunications providers are explicitly subject to relevant obligations in the regulatory regime. The bill gives extra-territorial effect to provisions covering the telecommunications development levy and the regulatory-cost levy, Part 7 consumer protections for retail service providers, applicable Part 5 regulations (such as minimum requirements for emergency call services), and Part 2 designated or specified services, and clarifies that TICSA obligations on network operators and service providers apply whether they are based in New Zealand or overseas. It also introduces a new enforcement mechanism allowing radio and spectrum licences to be revoked, suspended, or restricted where existing mechanisms such as court orders or penalties are impracticable against a breaching party.

⚡ Taken under urgency

Parliament advanced this bill under urgency (first reading) — moving it through faster than usual, with less time than normal for public submissions.

Full bill summary & link to official bill page

This omnibus bill amends the Telecommunications Act 2001, the Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Act 2013, and the Radiocommunications Act 1989 to make clear that overseas telecommunications providers serving New Zealand consumers are explicitly subject to relevant obligations in the regulatory regime, and to create a mechanism to address non-compliance, including a licence-revocation enforcement option. It responds to the regime having been largely silent on the extra-territorial reach of those obligations as technology and markets have evolved.

Supporters argue that bringing offshore providers under the same rules levels the playing field with domestic operators and protects consumers, security, and lawful-interception requirements. Others may consider the practicality of enforcing obligations on overseas firms and whether the new mechanisms are proportionate and workable across different kinds of providers.

See the Parliament.nz ↗ site for the full bill.

Oppose (No) Support (Yes)

Telecommunications and Other Matters Amendment Bill · First Reading, 18 Nov 2025
Agreed on the voices — no counted division.