Five Million Voices

Should the law be changed so that game animals designated as 'herds of special interest' are not required to be exterminated under conservation legislation?

The bill amends the Game Animal Council Act 2013 so that valued introduced game species designated as herds of special interest are not subject to a requirement to be exterminated, supporting a hunter-led management approach for those herds.

⚡ Taken under urgency

Parliament advanced this bill under urgency (first reading, second reading) — moving it through faster than usual, with less time than normal for public submissions.

MPs’ arguments for and against the bill

Why support it
  • Supporters argued that hunters function as an effective conservation tool, doing on-the-ground work such as maintaining tracks, resetting traps, and managing animal numbers.
  • Supporters pointed to monitoring results in the Fiordland Wapiti area, where they said browse impacts declined and vegetation regenerated compared with areas not under hunter-led management.
  • Supporters said the game animals, though introduced, hold cultural, food, and economic value, including significant revenue from international guided hunting.
Why oppose it
  • Opponents argued that the National Parks Act requires introduced animals to be exterminated because ungulates damage undergrowth in ecosystems that evolved without browsing mammals, and this change undermines that protection.
  • Opponents said the justification was inconsistent, shifting between tourism value and food for families, and questioned whether increased Department of Conservation funding would be a better response to managing pests.
  • Opponents contended that hunters have not effectively managed the ungulate problem, citing an escalating pest-damage crisis and instances of animals being deliberately moved to new areas.

These are claims MPs made in Parliament’s debate — not verified facts.

Full bill summary & link to official bill page

This bill strengthens the "Herds of Special Interest" (HOSI) framework for managing certain populations of game animals — introduced species such as deer, tahr, chamois and wild pigs that are hunted. Under the Game Animal Council Act 2013, the Minister responsible for hunting can designate a specific herd on public conservation land as a "herd of special interest," to be managed for its hunting, recreational or other value rather than simply treated as a pest to be removed. The bill clarifies and expands how a HOSI can be established and managed — notably confirming that a herd of special interest can be designated within a national park, and providing that a designated herd is not automatically subject to the eradication (remove-on-sight) requirements that otherwise apply to introduced animals under the National Parks Act 1980. In effect it enables hunter- and community-led management of valued game herds.

The bill is a Government bill reflecting a coalition commitment to recognise the value of hunting and game animals, and it builds on the Game Animal Council Act 2013 — the first New Zealand law to recognise and manage game animals as valued introduced species. Supporters, including hunting organisations and the Game Animal Council, argue that some herds have cultural, recreational and economic value, that hunters can help manage animal numbers and habitat, and that formal HOSI status enables cooperative, locally led management rather than blanket culling. Opponents, including many conservation and environmental groups, argue that deer, tahr and similar animals cause serious damage to native forests and alpine ecosystems, that protecting herds inside national parks conflicts with long-standing duties to remove introduced pests, and that the change risks prioritising hunting interests over biodiversity in areas set aside for native nature. Opinion is sharply divided between hunting and conservation interests.

See the Parliament.nz ↗ site for the full bill.

Oppose (No) Support (Yes)

Game Animal Council (Herds of Special Interest) Amendment Bill · Third Reading, 25 Jun 2026
Parliament voted 67–55 — it passed. (Provisional — from Hansard’s uncorrected transcript.)