Five Million Voices

Should an accelerated land-acquisition process be used to deliver listed critical infrastructure projects, including removing landowner objections to the Environment Court?

The bill amends the Public Works Act 1981 to create a faster land-acquisition process for specified critical infrastructure projects listed in Schedule 2 of the Fast-track Approvals Act and the roads of national significance in the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024.

MPs’ arguments for and against the bill

Why support it
  • Supporters argued New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit and faster delivery of critical projects would support economic growth, productivity, and lower costs for businesses and households.
  • Supporters said a single landowner objection to the Environment Court can add years of delay and significant legal and material costs, so a streamlined written submission process would deliver projects sooner.
  • Supporters noted landowners would receive incentive payments for early agreement and recognition payments for land acquired to help deliver critical infrastructure.
Why oppose it
  • Opponents argued several projects in the schedule are not on the Infrastructure Commission's priorities programme and that advice indicates over-spending on roads has produced poor outcomes.
  • Opponents said the bill creates an uneven system where some landowners affected by listed projects receive higher compensation while others notified under the ordinary process do not, raising fairness concerns.
  • Opponents raised concerns about the bill's effects on Māori rights and Treaty settlement interests, given a history of unfair Public Works Act takings and disposals of Māori land.

These are claims MPs made in Parliament’s debate — not verified facts.

Full bill summary & link to official bill page

The Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill amends the Public Works Act 1981, the law that lets the Crown and local authorities acquire private land for public works, sometimes compulsorily. The bill creates a faster acquisition pathway for named critical infrastructure projects, such as Roads of National Significance, by tightening the scope for landowner objections so projects face fewer delays. To encourage owners to settle early and hand over vacant possession by an agreed date, it offers a premium of an extra 10% of the land's value, subject to a floor of $5,000 and a cap of $100,000. It modernises the acquisition and compensation processes while keeping the overall framework of the 1981 Act. It mainly affects landowners whose property is needed for major infrastructure and the agencies delivering those projects.

This is a government bill, part of the coalition's broader push to speed up building nationally significant infrastructure. The main argument in favour is that it cuts delays and cost in delivering important projects while giving landowners a stronger incentive to settle early through better compensation. The main argument against is that narrowing objection rights weakens the protections and due process available to property owners, letting the Crown push acquisitions through faster with less room to challenge them, and that the fairness of the compensation and process settings is contested.

See the Parliament.nz ↗ site for the full bill.

Oppose (No) Support (Yes)

Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill · Third Reading, 21 Aug 2025
Parliament voted 102–20 — it passed.