Five Million Voices

Should the cap on the number of High Court judges be raised and court procedures be changed to reduce delays?

An omnibus bill amending several court statutes to improve timeliness, including raising the statutory maximum number of High Court judges and changing procedures in coronial and criminal cases.

⚡ Taken under urgency

Parliament advanced this bill under urgency (committee of whole house, first reading, second reading) — moving it through faster than usual, with less time than normal for public submissions.

MPs’ arguments for and against the bill

Why support it
  • Supporters argued that lifting the cap on High Court judges responds to population growth and would let the most serious cases be heard sooner.
  • Supporters said allowing coroners to close inquiries when new information makes them unnecessary would reduce the backlog of active coronial cases and give families answers faster.
  • Supporters said consolidating pre-trial processes for defendants facing charges across multiple court offices, and tightening procedures against abuse of process, would speed up justice for victims and use judicial time better.
Why oppose it
  • Some members said the increase to 60 judges fell short of the Chief Justice's recommended figure and was reduced back from a proposed 65 without the Minister exploring budget options to retain the higher number.
  • Some members noted the coroner provisions create retrospective effect, which departs from the general principle that legislation should not apply retrospectively.
  • Some members said other Government measures such as sentencing reforms contribute to court backlogs, and that reliance on urgency and ambiguous terms like 'plainly abusive' is not conducive to sound lawmaking.

These are claims MPs made in Parliament’s debate — not verified facts.

Full bill summary & link to official bill page

This omnibus bill amends several court statutes with the aim of making the justice system faster and reducing delays. Its changes include raising the statutory maximum number of High Court judges so more judges can be appointed, and adjusting procedures in coronial cases (official inquiries into deaths) and in criminal cases to help clear backlogs. It affects the courts, judges and coroners, as well as litigants, defendants and bereaved families who wait for cases and inquiries to be resolved.

The bill is a government measure responding to long-standing concern about court delays and growing caseloads. Supporters argue that allowing more judges and streamlining procedures will cut backlogs, shorten waiting times and improve access to justice. Critics, including submitters such as the Law Society, raised concerns about particular procedural changes and their effect on fairness and process, and questioned whether adding judges alone addresses the deeper, systemic causes of delay without wider resourcing of the court system.

See the Parliament.nz ↗ site for the full bill.

Oppose (No) Support (Yes)

Judicature (Timeliness) Legislation Amendment Bill · Third Reading, 17 Dec 2025
Parliament voted 117–6 — it passed.